Paul, Research Analyst
Mid · Specialist · Available now

Paul.

Research Analyst

Conducts background research on companies, individuals, cases, and markets. Paul produces tight sourced briefs in the format your team uses, with citations you can verify before you act on them.

Monthly salary
$599
vs. $3,500 to $5,000 for a comparable paralegal or junior associate
One-time hiring fee
$1,500
Database access, format training, knowledge base setup, 30-day onboarding
Hire Paul See Sample Work Available now  ·  14-day setup
01 / The Role

What Paul actually does on a Tuesday.

Paul fills the research hours that should never have been on a senior attorney's plate. When a new matter opens, when a client asks about a counterparty, when a partner needs to understand a market before a negotiation, Paul starts immediately and delivers a brief before the deadline.

The work he takes off your team: the three-hour court records search before a call that only needs a ten-minute briefing doc. The background check on a potential client that always takes longer than expected. The case law sweep for a brief being drafted at 5pm on a Wednesday. The competitive landscape summary for a business formation client who wants to understand their industry before signing.

Paul does not give legal advice. He gathers, synthesizes, and cites. Every brief includes source links and document references. Every claim is traceable. Your attorneys take his output and apply judgment to it.

A typical Tuesday for Paul.

  • 08:00
    New matter opened. Paul starts background research on the counterparty: corporate filings, public records, prior litigation, key personnel, recent news. Matter is Bracken Properties commercial lease review.
  • 10:30
    First brief delivered. 2.5 hours from request to finished document. Partner reviews, asks for a deeper dive on one subsidiary that appeared in the filings.
  • 11:15
    Subsidiary analysis delivered. 45 minutes. Paul found two prior judgments and a regulatory filing worth flagging.
  • 13:00
    Case law research request. Brief being drafted needs on-point Minnesota precedents on commercial lease restraint-on-alienation clauses. Paul identifies three, summarizes holdings, and notes applicability. Delivered with citations.
  • 14:30
    Market research for a business formation client. Industry size, three comparable companies, relevant regulatory landscape. Two-page snapshot delivered in 90 minutes.
  • 16:00
    Partner uses the brief directly in the client memo. No reformatting. Paul logs the completed research to the matter file and the knowledge base.
02 / Sample Work

What Paul's actual output looks like.

Three real examples. Research depth and citation format are calibrated to your practice area and partner preferences during onboarding.

Document · Company Background BriefDelivered in 2.5 hrs
Company Background Brief
Counterparty: Bracken Properties, Inc. Matter: CRE-2026-0847 Delivered: Nov 14, 2026 · 10:32am

Corporate Structure

Bracken Properties, Inc. is a Minnesota-registered C-corporation (EIN 41-XXXXXXX), incorporated 2011. Principal office: 200 S 6th St, Minneapolis. Three subsidiaries identified: Bracken North Loop LLC, Bracken Warehouse Holdings LLC, Bracken Industrial MN LLC. The Warehouse Holdings entity carries an unresolved judgment from 2019, flagged for review.

Key Personnel

CEO Marcus Tanaka (since 2015, prior: JLL Minneapolis). CFO Rachel Sohn. General Counsel on retainer: Hester & Partners LLP. Potential conflict: Hester is also opposing counsel on the Loop Development matter.

Prior Litigation (Public Records)

Two civil matters on PACER: Bracken Warehouse Holdings LLC v. Midnorth Freight (2019, settled) and a property tax dispute with Hennepin County (2022, dismissed). No criminal history, no regulatory sanctions found.

MN Secretary of State PACER / CourtListener LinkedIn (personnel) Hennepin County Records
List · Case Law Summary3 precedents identified
Case Law Research
Topic: Restraint on alienation, commercial leases, MN
  • 612 N.W.2d 414 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000)
    Riverfront Realty Corp. v. Park Associates
    Held: Absolute prohibition on subletting is an unreasonable restraint on alienation when the lease contains no legitimate business justification. Court required landlord to show reasonable grounds for refusal.
    ↳ Directly on point. Client's use clause contains a broad subleasing prohibition.
  • 548 N.W.2d 220 (Minn. 1996)
    Hennepin Industrial Partners v. Lund Holdings
    Held: A landlord's withholding of consent to sublease is commercially unreasonable if the tenant's proposed subtenant meets the same financial qualifications as the original tenant.
    ↳ Supports client position on exit flexibility argument.
  • No. A22-0441 (Minn. Ct. App. 2023)
    North Loop Dev. LLC v. Meridian Commercial
    Held: Lease language requiring "sole discretion" approval of subleases will be construed against the drafter when ambiguous. Landlord must articulate specific reasons for refusal.
    ↳ Recent precedent; directly addresses "sole discretion" language present in client's draft lease.
Dashboard · Market Research SnapshotDelivered in 90 min
Market Research Snapshot
Minneapolis Commercial Real Estate · Warehouse / Light Industrial · November 2026
$14.2B
Twin Cities CRE total market value (est. 2026)
7.4%
Industrial vacancy rate, Minneapolis metro (Q3 2026)
$9.80
Avg asking lease rate per sq ft, light industrial (Q3 2026)
11
Comparable lease transactions identified within 2-mile radius (18 mo)
Context: Industrial vacancy in the Minneapolis metro tightened from 9.1% in Q1 to 7.4% in Q3 2026, driven by e-commerce fulfillment demand. The North Loop submarket is undersupplied for Class B warehouse space. Three of the 11 comparable transactions show lease rates above $10.50/sq ft, suggesting the $9.20 rate in the current draft is below-market. Recommend client reference comparable rate data in any addendum negotiation. Full comparable transaction list attached as Exhibit A.
03 / What Paul Connects To

The sources and systems Paul works with.

Paul connects to both public research sources and your firm's internal systems. He pulls context from your matter files and logs everything he produces back to the right records.

Web research

Open-source intelligence

Exa, Perplexity, general web, news aggregators
Legal databases

Case law & public records

CourtListener, PACER, RECAP, state court portals
Corporate records

Entity research

State SOS portals, OpenCorporates, SEC EDGAR
Document storage

Brief delivery & filing

SharePoint, NetDocuments, Google Drive, iManage
CRM / matter mgmt

Matter context

Clio, HubSpot, Salesforce (for matter and party data)
News & data

Market intelligence

CoStar (read), public market reports, Reuters, Bloomberg free tier
Knowledge base

Prior work product

Peggy's knowledge library (if also hired), SharePoint search
Formatting

Citation output

Bluebook style, ALWD, or custom firm citation format
Westlaw and LexisNexis not included by default. Paul accesses free legal databases (CourtListener, PACER) and open-source research. If your firm has existing Westlaw or LexisNexis credentials, Paul can be configured to use them at no additional cost beyond your existing license.
04 / Onboarding

Fourteen days from offer letter to unsupervised research.

Paul learns your citation format, your brief structure, and the kinds of questions each partner tends to ask during a 14-day onboarding.

Days 1 to 3

Format & access

Paul receives sample briefs from your existing work product. He learns your citation style, heading format, and the level of detail each partner expects.

Days 4 to 7

Shadow mode

Paul delivers briefs for partner review before they are used. You mark gaps, source problems, and format corrections. He adapts with each round.

Days 8 to 11

Supervised live

Paul's briefs go directly into your workflow. You review the first delivery of each new research type and flag anything that misses the mark.

Day 14

Unsupervised

Paul researches independently. Citation accuracy and format compliance are monitored via the monthly quality review. The 30-day check-in is on the calendar.

05 / The Numbers

What Paul is measured on. What he costs. What he saves.

Performance targets

  • Turnaround time for a standard research brief< 3 hours
  • Citation accuracy rate> 99%
  • Partner uses brief without reformatting> 90%
  • Briefs produced per week12 to 20
  • Requests requiring clarification before starting< 10%
  • Sources cited per brief (average)5+

Year one cost vs. comparable paralegal

  • Paul: monthly salary × 12$7,188
  • Paul: one-time hiring fee$1,500
  • Paul: total Y1$8,688
  • Research paralegal Y1 (low end)$36,000
  • You save (low end)$27,312
06 / Common Questions

About hiring Paul specifically.

What kinds of research can Paul handle?

Background research on counterparties, witnesses, and potential clients (corporate structure, public filings, litigation history, key personnel). Case law research in state and federal courts. Market and industry research (size, comparables, regulatory landscape). Due diligence prep (pre-closing checklist support, public record sweeps). The common thread is that the output is a brief, a list, or a structured document, not a legal opinion.

Does Paul have access to paid legal research databases like Westlaw or LexisNexis?

Not by default, because most of the research Paul does can be sourced through free databases (CourtListener, PACER, RECAP, state court portals). If your firm already has Westlaw or LexisNexis credentials, Paul can be configured to work through those databases at no additional fee beyond your existing subscription. That configuration happens during onboarding.

How does Paul format his briefs?

During onboarding, you share three to five sample briefs from your existing work product. Paul learns your heading structure, citation style (Bluebook, ALWD, or custom), and the level of detail each partner expects. By day 10, his output should go directly into your workflow without reformatting. If it does not, we tune it until it does before the 90-day guarantee window closes.

Can Paul research in regulated industries like healthcare or financial services?

Yes, with appropriate scoping. Paul accesses publicly available records, SEC filings, regulatory databases (FDA public records, FINRA BrokerCheck, HHS OIG exclusions list), and news sources. He does not access private healthcare data or non-public financial information. For matters in regulated industries, the research brief notes which findings are from public sources and flags areas where additional specialist review may be warranted.

What if Paul's research turns up something that needs legal interpretation?

Paul flags it. If he finds a prior judgment, an unresolved lien, a regulatory sanction, or any record that a reasonable attorney would want to know about, he surfaces it clearly in the brief with a note recommending partner review. He does not interpret it, advise on it, or act on it. The judgment call stays with you.

Mid · Specialist · $599/mo

Hire Paul.
Your next brief lands
in under three hours.

Two weeks of guided setup. Producing research independently by day 14. Performance guaranteed for the first 90 days. If he does not meet standard, we replace him or refund the hiring fee.

$599/mo + $1,500 one-time  ·  14-day setup  ·  90-day guarantee  ·  Cancel with 30 days notice